XHS-Downloader vs xiaohongshu-mcp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- xiaohongshu-mcp is growing faster: +280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +150 for XHS-Downloader.
- Pick XHS-Downloader for: 小红书（XiaoHongShu、RedNote）链接提取/作品采集工具. Pick xiaohongshu-mcp for: mCP for xiaohongshu.com.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
X
XHS-Downloaderopen-source
小红书（XiaoHongShu、RedNote）链接提取/作品采集工具
x
xiaohongshu-mcpopen-source
MCP for xiaohongshu.com
Metrics
| XHS-Downloader | xiaohongshu-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.9k | 16.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 150 | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 79 | 67 |
| Releases (6m) | 1 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.5463062442422588 | 0.6713056140263894 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, XHS-Downloader or xiaohongshu-mcp?
- xiaohongshu-mcp has more GitHub stars (16,093 vs 12,892).
- Which is more actively developed, XHS-Downloader or xiaohongshu-mcp?
- XHS-Downloader had more commits in the last 90 days (79 vs 67).
- Should I use XHS-Downloader or xiaohongshu-mcp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.