Playwright MCP server vs Stagehand
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Playwright MCP server is growing faster: +590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +300 for Stagehand.
- Pick Playwright MCP server for: playwright MCP server. Pick Stagehand for: the SDK to extract data and interact with any site on the web.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
P
Playwright MCP serveropen-source
Playwright MCP server
S
Stagehandopen-source
The SDK to extract data and interact with any site on the web. Get started with Claude Code, Codex, Eve, Mastra, and more.
Metrics
| Playwright MCP server | Stagehand | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37.8k | 25.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 590 | 300 |
| Commits (90d) | 35 | 189 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 29.0M | 1.1M |
| Overall score | 0.714300839719364 | 0.7368322331963058 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Playwright MCP server or Stagehand?
- Playwright MCP server has more GitHub stars (37,778 vs 25,522).
- Which is more actively developed, Playwright MCP server or Stagehand?
- Stagehand had more commits in the last 90 days (189 vs 35).
- Should I use Playwright MCP server or Stagehand?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.