planning-with-files vs Vibe Kanban
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- planning-with-files is growing faster: +590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +290 for Vibe Kanban.
- Pick planning-with-files for: persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Pick Vibe Kanban for: get 10X more out of Claude Code, Codex or any coding agent.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks
V
Vibe Kanbanopen-source
Get 10X more out of Claude Code, Codex or any coding agent
Metrics
| planning-with-files | Vibe Kanban | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27.3k | 28.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 590 | 290 |
| Commits (90d) | 228 | 10 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 3 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 2.7K | 10.2K |
| Overall score | 0.7798501915116138 | 0.5685123362132869 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, planning-with-files or Vibe Kanban?
- Vibe Kanban has more GitHub stars (28,253 vs 27,264).
- Which is more actively developed, planning-with-files or Vibe Kanban?
- planning-with-files had more commits in the last 90 days (228 vs 10).
- Should I use planning-with-files or Vibe Kanban?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.