OpenViking vs Supermemory
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenViking is growing faster: +990 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +280 for Supermemory.
- Pick OpenViking for: self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Pick Supermemory for: memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenVikingopen-source
Self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Unify Agent Memory, Knowledge RAG and Skills.
S
Supermemoryopen-source
Memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally. The Memory API for the AI era.
Metrics
| OpenViking | Supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39.2k | 31.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 990 | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.0k | 187 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 441.3K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8645490564903204 | 0.730923354028454 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenViking or Supermemory?
- OpenViking has more GitHub stars (39,153 vs 31,067).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenViking or Supermemory?
- OpenViking had more commits in the last 90 days (1,047 vs 187).
- Should I use OpenViking or Supermemory?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.