OpenSandbox vs Orca
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Orca is growing faster: +18,590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +360 for OpenSandbox.
- Pick OpenSandbox for: secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents. Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenSandboxopen-source
Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.
O
Orcaopen-source
Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.
Metrics
| OpenSandbox | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15.7k | 84.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 360 | 18.6k |
| Commits (90d) | 1.5k | 6.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 372.2K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8167282211378699 | 0.953845632256653 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenSandbox or Orca?
- Orca has more GitHub stars (84,122 vs 15,653).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenSandbox or Orca?
- Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,597 vs 1,532).
- Should I use OpenSandbox or Orca?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.