OpenHuman vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +130 for Trigger.dev.
- Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Metrics
| OpenHuman | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40.5k | 16.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.5k | 130 |
| Commits (90d) | 22.8k | 713 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9308227395695856 | 0.7330060666473396 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenHuman or Trigger.dev?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 16,458).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenHuman or Trigger.dev?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 713).
- Should I use OpenHuman or Trigger.dev?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.