OpenAgents vs OpenHuman

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • OpenAgents has had no commit in 22 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,774 commits in the last 90 days).
  • OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +20 for OpenAgents.
  • Pick OpenAgents for: cOLM 2024 OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the Wild. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

OpenAgentsopen-source

[COLM 2024] OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the Wild

O
OpenHumanopen-source

OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust

Metrics

OpenAgentsOpenHuman
Stars4.9k40.5k
Star velocity /mo20.2105263157894732.5k
Commits (90d)022.8k
Releases (6m)010
Overall score0.208236961513515870.9308227395695856

Pros

  • +集成三大核心代理功能,覆盖数据分析、工具调用和网络浏览等主要使用场景
  • +完全开源架构支持本地部署,用户可自主控制数据和定制功能
  • +提供 200+ 日常工具集成,极大扩展了代理的实用性和适用范围

    Cons

    • -作为学术研究项目,可能在商业化支持和长期维护方面存在不确定性
    • -相比商业产品可能在用户界面优化和使用体验方面仍有改进空间

      Use Cases

      • •数据分析师使用数据代理进行复杂数据处理和可视化分析
      • •普通用户通过插件代理调用各种日常工具完成生活和工作任务
      • •研究人员利用网络代理自动化网页浏览和信息收集工作

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 4,863).
        Which is more actively developed, OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
        OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 0).
        Should I use OpenAgents or OpenHuman?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.