Omnigent vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +3,180 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +675 for Omnigent.
- Pick Omnigent for: open-source meta-harness for orchestrating Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom AI agents. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
Omnigentopen-source
Open-source meta-harness for orchestrating Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom AI agents
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| Omnigent | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10.4k | 40.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 675 | 3.2k |
| Commits (90d) | 3.2k | 22.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8852250027982211 | 0.9408550749378012 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Omnigent or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,447 vs 10,420).
- Which is more actively developed, Omnigent or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 3,227).
- Should I use Omnigent or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.