Which is more popular, OmO or screenshot-to-code?

screenshot-to-code has more GitHub stars (79,946 vs 69,768).

Which is more actively developed, OmO or screenshot-to-code?

OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 58).

Should I use OmO or screenshot-to-code?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

OmO vs screenshot-to-code

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

screenshot-to-code is growing faster: +1,240 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +810 for OmO.
Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Pick screenshot-to-code for: drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue).

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

OmOopen-source

OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.

screenshot-to-codeopen-source

Drop in a screenshot and convert it to clean code (HTML/Tailwind/React/Vue)

Metrics

	OmO	screenshot-to-code
Stars	69.8k	79.9k
Star velocity /mo	810	1.2k
Commits (90d)	9.7k	58
Releases (6m)	10	0
Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI)	91.7K	—
Overall score	0.8973547831718989	0.5382483256328683

Pros

+Multi-framework support with clean output in HTML/Tailwind, React, Vue, Bootstrap, and SVG formats
+Integration with leading AI models (Gemini 3, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5) ensuring high-quality code generation
+Experimental video-to-code feature enables conversion of screen recordings into functional prototypes

Cons

-Requires API keys from paid AI services (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google), adding ongoing operational costs
-Quality heavily dependent on AI model performance, with open-source alternatives like Ollama producing poor results
-Limited to visual conversion - cannot understand complex business logic or backend functionality

Use Cases

•Rapid prototyping where designers can quickly convert mockups into working code for client demos
•Design system implementation to transform Figma components into consistent React/Vue component libraries
•Legacy interface modernization by screenshotting old UIs and converting them to modern framework code

View OmO Details View screenshot-to-code Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, OmO or screenshot-to-code?: screenshot-to-code has more GitHub stars (79,946 vs 69,768).
Which is more actively developed, OmO or screenshot-to-code?: OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 58).
Should I use OmO or screenshot-to-code?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.