oh-my-claudecode vs OmO
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Pick oh-my-claudecode for: teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code. Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
o
oh-my-claudecodeopen-source
Teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code
O
OmOopen-source
OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.
Metrics
| oh-my-claudecode | OmO | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39.5k | 69.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 810 | 1.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 1.6k | 9.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8804499063456995 | 0.9105351293499632 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, oh-my-claudecode or OmO?
- OmO has more GitHub stars (69,754 vs 39,534).
- Which is more actively developed, oh-my-claudecode or OmO?
- OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,367 vs 1,626).
- Should I use oh-my-claudecode or OmO?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.