Which is more popular, MinerU or OpenChatKit?

MinerU has more GitHub stars (80,986 vs 8,983).

Which is more actively developed, MinerU or OpenChatKit?

MinerU had more commits in the last 90 days (905 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

OpenChatKit has had no commit in 30 months; MinerU is actively maintained (905 commits in the last 90 days).
MinerU is growing faster: +3,746 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-4 for OpenChatKit.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Transforms complex documents like PDFs into LLM-ready markdown/JSON for your Agentic workflows.

+Multiple model sizes and architectures available (7B to 20B parameters) for different computational budgets and use cases
+Includes retrieval augmentation system for incorporating external knowledge and up-to-date information
+Complete open-source solution with Apache 2.0 licensing and comprehensive training infrastructure

-Requires significant computational resources for training and running larger models
-Complex setup process with multiple dependencies including PyTorch, Miniconda, and Git LFS
-Limited recent updates and maintenance compared to more actively developed alternatives

•Training custom conversational AI models for domain-specific applications like customer service or technical support
•Fine-tuning existing models on proprietary datasets to create specialized chat assistants
•Building retrieval-augmented chatbots that can access and cite information from custom knowledge bases

Which is more popular, MinerU or OpenChatKit?: MinerU has more GitHub stars (80,986 vs 8,983).
Which is more actively developed, MinerU or OpenChatKit?: MinerU had more commits in the last 90 days (905 vs 0).
Should I use MinerU or OpenChatKit?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.