mcp-use vs Playwright MCP server
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Playwright MCP server is growing faster: +540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +210 for mcp-use.
- Pick mcp-use for: the fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents. Pick Playwright MCP server for: playwright MCP server.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
m
mcp-useopen-source
The fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
P
Playwright MCP serveropen-source
Playwright MCP server
Metrics
| mcp-use | Playwright MCP server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10.7k | 37.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 210 | 540 |
| Commits (90d) | 666 | 35 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7773994138547169 | 0.7372651823133481 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, mcp-use or Playwright MCP server?
- Playwright MCP server has more GitHub stars (37,737 vs 10,711).
- Which is more actively developed, mcp-use or Playwright MCP server?
- mcp-use had more commits in the last 90 days (666 vs 35).
- Should I use mcp-use or Playwright MCP server?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.