LobeHub vs Self-hosted AI starter kit
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- LobeHub is growing faster: +310 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-10 for Self-hosted AI starter kit.
- Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling. Pick Self-hosted AI starter kit for: open-source Docker Compose template for self-hosted AI workflows with n8n, Ollama, Qdrant, and PostgreSQL.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
S
Self-hosted AI starter kitopen-source
Open-source Docker Compose template for self-hosted AI workflows with n8n, Ollama, Qdrant, and PostgreSQL
Metrics
| LobeHub | Self-hosted AI starter kit | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 83.0k | 15.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 310 | -10 |
| Commits (90d) | 2.4k | 1 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Overall score | 0.8263760210963236 | 0.1860427825137143 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, LobeHub or Self-hosted AI starter kit?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 15,274).
- Which is more actively developed, LobeHub or Self-hosted AI starter kit?
- LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 1).
- Should I use LobeHub or Self-hosted AI starter kit?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.