LobeHub vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +3,180 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +435 for LobeHub.
- Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| LobeHub | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 83.0k | 40.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 435 | 3.2k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.4k | 22.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8533519039832247 | 0.9408550749378012 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, LobeHub or OpenHuman?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,957 vs 40,447).
- Which is more actively developed, LobeHub or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 2,430).
- Should I use LobeHub or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.