Khoj vs LobeHub
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- LobeHub is growing faster: +310 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +90 for Khoj.
- Pick Khoj for: open-source, self-hostable platform for custom AI agents, research, automation, and personal assistance. Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
K
Khojopen-source
Open-source, self-hostable platform for custom AI agents, research, automation, and personal assistance
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
Metrics
| Khoj | LobeHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37.6k | 83.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 90 | 310 |
| Commits (90d) | 2 | 2.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 8.9K | — |
| Overall score | 0.35552690494390915 | 0.8263760210963236 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Khoj or LobeHub?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 37,556).
- Which is more actively developed, Khoj or LobeHub?
- LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 2).
- Should I use Khoj or LobeHub?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.