Kestra vs LobeHub
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Kestra is growing faster: +3,540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +310 for LobeHub.
- Pick Kestra for: event Driven Orchestration & Scheduling Platform for Mission Critical Applications. Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
K
Kestraopen-source
Event Driven Orchestration & Scheduling Platform for Mission Critical Applications
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
Metrics
| Kestra | LobeHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28.9k | 83.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 3.5k | 310 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.5k | 2.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9089092692995532 | 0.8263760210963236 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Kestra or LobeHub?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 28,908).
- Which is more actively developed, Kestra or LobeHub?
- LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 1,491).
- Should I use Kestra or LobeHub?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.