HyperFrames vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,430 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +3,030 for omp.
- Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| HyperFrames | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 55.6k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 14.4k | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.9k | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.9467131295947988 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, HyperFrames or omp?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (55,595 vs 34,075).
- Which is more actively developed, HyperFrames or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 2,927).
- Should I use HyperFrames or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.