HyperFrames vs Kong
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,710 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +110 for Kong.
- Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML. Pick Kong for: the API and AI Gateway.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
K
Kongopen-source
π¦ The API and AI Gateway
Metrics
| HyperFrames | Kong | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 56.1k | 44.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 14.7k | 110 |
| Commits (90d) | 3.0k | 10 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 2 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 1.7M | β |
| Overall score | 0.94184515668165 | 0.5318560078693034 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, HyperFrames or Kong?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (56,104 vs 44,236).
- Which is more actively developed, HyperFrames or Kong?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,970 vs 10).
- Should I use HyperFrames or Kong?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.