holaOS vs Orca
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Orca is growing faster: +19,335 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-30 for holaOS.
- Pick holaOS for: open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations. Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
h
holaOSopen-source
Open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations
O
Orcaopen-source
Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.
Metrics
| holaOS | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.5k | 83.6k |
| Star velocity /mo | -30 | 19.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 157 | 6.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 1 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.35581686318646477 | 0.957769928427318 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, holaOS or Orca?
- Orca has more GitHub stars (83,552 vs 11,453).
- Which is more actively developed, holaOS or Orca?
- Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,438 vs 157).
- Should I use holaOS or Orca?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.