Hive vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Trigger.dev is growing faster: +130 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-60 for Hive.
- Pick Hive for: multi-Agent Harness for Production AI. Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
H
Hiveopen-source
Multi-Agent Harness for Production AI
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Metrics
| Hive | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.1k | 16.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | -60 | 130 |
| Commits (90d) | 22 | 713 |
| Releases (6m) | 7 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 2.9M |
| Overall score | 0.35490087781026464 | 0.7330060666473396 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Hive or Trigger.dev?
- Trigger.dev has more GitHub stars (16,458 vs 11,088).
- Which is more actively developed, Hive or Trigger.dev?
- Trigger.dev had more commits in the last 90 days (713 vs 22).
- Should I use Hive or Trigger.dev?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.