Which is more popular, Happy or OmO?

OmO has more GitHub stars (69,768 vs 23,993).

Which is more actively developed, Happy or OmO?

OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 322).

Should I use Happy or OmO?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Happy vs OmO

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

Pick Happy for: mobile and Web client for Codex and Claude Code, with realtime voice, encryption and fully featured. Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Happyopen-source

Mobile and Web client for Codex and Claude Code, with realtime voice, encryption and fully featured

OmOopen-source

OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.

Metrics

	Happy	OmO
Stars	24.0k	69.8k
Star velocity /mo	1.2k	810
Commits (90d)	322	9.7k
Releases (6m)	10	10
Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI)	35.1K	91.7K
Overall score	0.8295861408886525	0.8973547831718989

Pros

+提供完整的移动端访问能力，支持 iOS、Android 和 Web 平台
+端到端加密保护代码安全，开源架构支持代码审计
+无缝设备切换体验，一键在手机和桌面间转换控制权

Cons

-需要安装额外的 CLI 包装器，增加了系统复杂度
-依赖网络连接进行远程通信，可能受网络状况影响
-作为第三方工具，需要额外的配置和维护工作

Use Cases

•外出时通过手机监控长时间运行的 AI 编程任务
•在多设备间灵活切换，随时随地查看代码生成进度
•团队协作场景下的远程代码审查和实时监控

View Happy Details View OmO Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, Happy or OmO?: OmO has more GitHub stars (69,768 vs 23,993).
Which is more actively developed, Happy or OmO?: OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 322).
Should I use Happy or OmO?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.