Graphiti vs Supermemory
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Graphiti is growing faster: +740 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +280 for Supermemory.
- Pick Graphiti for: build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents. Pick Supermemory for: memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
G
Graphitiopen-source
Build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents
S
Supermemoryopen-source
Memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally. The Memory API for the AI era.
Metrics
| Graphiti | Supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.4k | 31.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 740 | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 117 | 187 |
| Releases (6m) | 7 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 608.9K | — |
| Overall score | 0.7219871556209319 | 0.730923354028454 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graphiti or Supermemory?
- Graphiti has more GitHub stars (31,400 vs 31,067).
- Which is more actively developed, Graphiti or Supermemory?
- Supermemory had more commits in the last 90 days (187 vs 117).
- Should I use Graphiti or Supermemory?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.