Which is more popular, Graft or Orca?

Orca has more GitHub stars (83,552 vs 9,504).

Which is more actively developed, Graft or Orca?

Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,438 vs 506).

Should I use Graft or Orca?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Graft vs Orca

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

Orca is growing faster: +19,335 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,065 for Graft.
Pick Graft for: turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual. Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Graftopen-source

Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.

Orcaopen-source

Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.

Metrics

	Graft	Orca
Stars	9.5k	83.6k
Star velocity /mo	1.1k	19.3k
Commits (90d)	506	6.4k
Releases (6m)	0	10
Overall score	0.7281102466707609	0.957769928427318

View Graft Details View Orca Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, Graft or Orca?: Orca has more GitHub stars (83,552 vs 9,504).
Which is more actively developed, Graft or Orca?: Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,438 vs 506).
Should I use Graft or Orca?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.