Graft vs memU
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Graft is growing faster: +1,065 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-60 for memU.
- Graft is open-source; memU is freemium.
- Pick Graft for: turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual. Pick memU for: personal memory across agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
m
memUfreemium
Personal memory across agents
Metrics
| Graft | memU | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.5k | 14.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.1k | -60 |
| Commits (90d) | 506 | 132 |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 1 |
| Overall score | 0.7281102466707609 | 0.4075794666292043 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Graft or memU?
- memU has more GitHub stars (14,491 vs 9,504).
- Which is more actively developed, Graft or memU?
- Graft had more commits in the last 90 days (506 vs 132).
- Should I use Graft or memU?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.