Graft vs Graphify

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Graphify is growing faster: +6,525 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,065 for Graft.
  • Graft is open-source; Graphify is freemium.
  • Pick Graft for: turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual. Pick Graphify for: local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

G
Graftopen-source

Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.

G
Graphifyfreemium

Local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph

Metrics

GraftGraphify
Stars9.5k123.2k
Star velocity /mo1.1k6.5k
Commits (90d)5061.0k
Releases (6m)010
Overall score0.72811024667076090.907547467169163

FAQ

Which is more popular, Graft or Graphify?
Graphify has more GitHub stars (123,201 vs 9,504).
Which is more actively developed, Graft or Graphify?
Graphify had more commits in the last 90 days (1,048 vs 506).
Should I use Graft or Graphify?
Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.