Which is more popular, GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?

OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,447 vs 1,051).

Which is more actively developed, GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?

OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 0).

Should I use GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

GPTSwarm vs OpenHuman

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

GPTSwarm has had no commit in 8 months; OpenHuman is actively maintained (22,600 commits in the last 90 days).
OpenHuman is growing faster: +3,180 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +5 for GPTSwarm.
Pick GPTSwarm for: the First Self-Improving Agentic Solution. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

GPTSwarmopen-source

🐝 The First Self-Improving Agentic Solution

OpenHumanopen-source

OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust

Metrics

	GPTSwarm	OpenHuman
Stars	1.1k	40.4k
Star velocity /mo	5.396825396825396	3.2k
Commits (90d)	0	22.6k
Releases (6m)	0	10
Overall score	0.1972868881470183	0.9408550749378012

Pros

+基于图的架构设计，支持复杂的多智能体协调和任务分解
+内置自我改进和优化能力，智能体群体可以自动提升性能
+强大的学术背景，ICML2024口头报告论文（top 1.5%），理论基础扎实

Cons

-偏向研究导向的项目，生产环境就绪度可能不足
-复杂的图架构和群体智能概念，学习曲线较陡峭
-文档相对有限，可能需要较多时间理解框架机制

Use Cases

•需要多智能体协调解决复杂问题的场景，如分布式任务处理
•群体智能和智能体优化算法的学术研究项目
•构建具有自学习能力的领域专用智能体系统

View GPTSwarm Details View OpenHuman Details

FAQ

Which is more popular, GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?: OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,447 vs 1,051).
Which is more actively developed, GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?: OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 0).
Should I use GPTSwarm or OpenHuman?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.