Feynman vs Khoj
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Feynman is growing faster: +140 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +90 for Khoj.
- Pick Feynman for: the open source AI research agent. Pick Khoj for: open-source, self-hostable platform for custom AI agents, research, automation, and personal assistance.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
Feynmanopen-source
The open source AI research agent.
K
Khojopen-source
Open-source, self-hostable platform for custom AI agents, research, automation, and personal assistance
Metrics
| Feynman | Khoj | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.9k | 37.6k |
| Star velocity /mo | 140 | 90 |
| Commits (90d) | 493 | 2 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 142.6K | 8.9K |
| Overall score | 0.726140081301661 | 0.35552690494390915 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Feynman or Khoj?
- Khoj has more GitHub stars (37,556 vs 9,865).
- Which is more actively developed, Feynman or Khoj?
- Feynman had more commits in the last 90 days (493 vs 2).
- Should I use Feynman or Khoj?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.