FastMCP vs n8n-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- FastMCP is growing faster: +160 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +30 for n8n-MCP.
- Pick FastMCP for: the fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients. Pick n8n-MCP for: a MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
FastMCPopen-source
π The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.
n
n8n-MCPopen-source
A MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you
Metrics
| FastMCP | n8n-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28.0k | 23.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 160 | 30 |
| Commits (90d) | 496 | 137 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | β | 424.8K |
| Overall score | 0.7366602628091307 | 0.6117161512649488 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, FastMCP or n8n-MCP?
- FastMCP has more GitHub stars (27,962 vs 23,032).
- Which is more actively developed, FastMCP or n8n-MCP?
- FastMCP had more commits in the last 90 days (496 vs 137).
- Should I use FastMCP or n8n-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.