FastMCP vs mcp-use
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Pick FastMCP for: the fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients. Pick mcp-use for: the fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
F
FastMCPopen-source
π The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.
m
mcp-useopen-source
The fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.
Metrics
| FastMCP | mcp-use | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28.0k | 10.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 180 | 195 |
| Commits (90d) | 490 | 665 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7551726720803966 | 0.7614806982370892 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, FastMCP or mcp-use?
- FastMCP has more GitHub stars (27,958 vs 10,717).
- Which is more actively developed, FastMCP or mcp-use?
- mcp-use had more commits in the last 90 days (665 vs 490).
- Should I use FastMCP or mcp-use?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.