EverOS vs Supermemory
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Supermemory is growing faster: +280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +150 for EverOS.
- Pick EverOS for: one portable memory layer for every AI agent: local-first, Markdown-native, user-owned, and self-evolving. Pick Supermemory for: memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
E
EverOSopen-source
One portable memory layer for every AI agent: local-first, Markdown-native, user-owned, and self-evolving across apps, tools, and workflows.
S
Supermemoryopen-source
Memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally. The Memory API for the AI era.
Metrics
| EverOS | Supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 13.3k | 31.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 150 | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 83 | 187 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.660120374462766 | 0.730923354028454 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, EverOS or Supermemory?
- Supermemory has more GitHub stars (31,067 vs 13,328).
- Which is more actively developed, EverOS or Supermemory?
- Supermemory had more commits in the last 90 days (187 vs 83).
- Should I use EverOS or Supermemory?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.