elizaOS vs OmO
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OmO is growing faster: +810 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +110 for elizaOS.
- Pick elizaOS for: open source agentic operating system. Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
e
elizaOSopen-source
Open source agentic operating system
O
OmOopen-source
OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.
Metrics
| elizaOS | OmO | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19.5k | 69.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 110 | 810 |
| Commits (90d) | 18.1k | 9.7k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 1.0K | 91.7K |
| Overall score | 0.7834772594331224 | 0.8973547831718989 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, elizaOS or OmO?
- OmO has more GitHub stars (69,768 vs 19,535).
- Which is more actively developed, elizaOS or OmO?
- elizaOS had more commits in the last 90 days (18,133 vs 9,692).
- Should I use elizaOS or OmO?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.