Which is more popular, ego lite or LaVague?

ego lite has more GitHub stars (16,793 vs 6,394).

Which is more actively developed, ego lite or LaVague?

ego lite had more commits in the last 90 days (220 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

LaVague has had no commit in 20 months; ego lite is actively maintained (220 commits in the last 90 days).
ego lite is growing faster: +710 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +12 for LaVague.
Pick ego lite for: browser for AI agents to automate in isolated Spaces while sharing your logins, cookies, and tabs. Pick LaVague for: large Action Model framework to develop AI Web Agents.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Browser for AI agents to automate in isolated Spaces while sharing your logins, cookies, and tabs

LaVagueopen-source

Large Action Model framework to develop AI Web Agents

+Well-architected framework with clear separation between World Model (planning) and Action Engine (execution) components
+Includes specialized LaVague QA tooling that converts Gherkin specs into automated tests for QA engineers
+Strong open-source community adoption with 6,318 GitHub stars and active development

-Framework complexity may require significant learning curve for developers new to web automation
-Depends on external automation tools like Selenium or Playwright, adding infrastructure dependencies

•Automating multi-step web research tasks like gathering installation instructions or documentation
•QA test automation by converting business requirements in Gherkin format into executable test suites
•Building user-facing automation tools that can navigate websites and perform complex workflows autonomously

Which is more popular, ego lite or LaVague?: ego lite has more GitHub stars (16,793 vs 6,394).
Which is more actively developed, ego lite or LaVague?: ego lite had more commits in the last 90 days (220 vs 0).
Should I use ego lite or LaVague?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.