OpenClaw vs oh-my-claudecode
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- oh-my-claudecode is growing faster: +690 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +50 for OpenClaw.
- Pick OpenClaw for: openClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System — 9 specialized AI agents with real-time dashboard, model config. Pick oh-my-claudecode for: teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenClawopen-source
OpenClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System — 9 specialized AI agents with real-time dashboard, model config, and full audit trails
o
oh-my-claudecodeopen-source
Teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code
Metrics
| OpenClaw | oh-my-claudecode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17.0k | 39.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 50 | 690 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 1.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 17.8K |
| Overall score | 0.2389578676106601 | 0.8668410498553292 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenClaw or oh-my-claudecode?
- oh-my-claudecode has more GitHub stars (39,549 vs 16,960).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenClaw or oh-my-claudecode?
- oh-my-claudecode had more commits in the last 90 days (1,632 vs 0).
- Should I use OpenClaw or oh-my-claudecode?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.