OpenClaw vs hermes-agent
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- hermes-agent is growing faster: +5,710 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +50 for OpenClaw.
- Pick OpenClaw for: openClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System — 9 specialized AI agents with real-time dashboard, model config. Pick hermes-agent for: the agent that grows with you.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
O
OpenClawopen-source
OpenClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System — 9 specialized AI agents with real-time dashboard, model config, and full audit trails
h
hermes-agentopen-source
The agent that grows with you
Metrics
| OpenClaw | hermes-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17.0k | 250.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 50 | 5.7k |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 33.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.2389578676106601 | 0.946551175635728 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, OpenClaw or hermes-agent?
- hermes-agent has more GitHub stars (250,877 vs 16,960).
- Which is more actively developed, OpenClaw or hermes-agent?
- hermes-agent had more commits in the last 90 days (33,428 vs 0).
- Should I use OpenClaw or hermes-agent?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.