ECC vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- ECC is growing faster: +15,970 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +2,510 for OpenHuman.
- Pick ECC for: coordinated engineering system for AI coding agents with planning, testing, review, memory, and security. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
E
ECCopen-source
Coordinated engineering system for AI coding agents with planning, testing, review, memory, and security
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| ECC | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 271.7k | 40.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 16.0k | 2.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 787 | 22.8k |
| Releases (6m) | 7 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 42.5K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8565295708921501 | 0.9308227395695856 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, ECC or OpenHuman?
- ECC has more GitHub stars (271,730 vs 40,486).
- Which is more actively developed, ECC or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 787).
- Should I use ECC or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.