drawio-skill vs HyperFrames
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,710 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +300 for drawio-skill.
- Pick drawio-skill for: agent skill that converts natural language and technical sources into editable, tested draw.io diagrams. Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
d
drawio-skillopen-source
Agent skill that converts natural language and technical sources into editable, tested draw.io diagrams
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
Metrics
| drawio-skill | HyperFrames | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9.8k | 56.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 300 | 14.7k |
| Commits (90d) | 103 | 3.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 1.7M |
| Overall score | 0.7158499066355768 | 0.94184515668165 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, drawio-skill or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (56,104 vs 9,804).
- Which is more actively developed, drawio-skill or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,970 vs 103).
- Should I use drawio-skill or HyperFrames?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.