Docling vs olmocr

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • olmocr has had no commit in 6 months; Docling is actively maintained (357 commits in the last 90 days).
  • Docling is growing faster: +1,850 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +413 for olmocr.
  • Pick Docling for: get your documents ready for gen AI. Pick olmocr for: toolkit for linearizing PDFs for LLM datasets/training.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Doclingopen-source

Get your documents ready for gen AI

olmocropen-source

Toolkit for linearizing PDFs for LLM datasets/training

Metrics

Doclingolmocr
Stars68.3k19.7k
Star velocity /mo1.8k413.3684210526315
Commits (90d)3570
Releases (6m)100
Overall score0.84502613534776640.3454145003701764

Pros

  • +Advanced PDF understanding with layout analysis, table structure recognition, and reading order detection
  • +Supports wide variety of document formats including office documents, images, audio, and markup languages
  • +Unified DoclingDocument representation simplifies integration with AI workflows and downstream processing
  • +Excellent handling of complex document layouts including equations, tables, handwriting, and multi-column formats with natural reading order preservation
  • +Cost-effective processing at under $200 per million pages, making it economical for large-scale dataset creation
  • +Continuous model improvements with recent releases showing significant performance gains and reduced hallucinations on blank documents

Cons

  • -Processing complex documents with advanced features may require significant computational resources
  • -Requires GPU resources due to 7B parameter model, making it computationally intensive and potentially expensive to run
  • -May require multiple retries for some documents to achieve optimal results
  • -Limited to image-based document formats (PDF, PNG, JPEG) and requires technical expertise for setup and optimization

Use Cases

  • •Converting research papers and technical documents into AI-ready formats for RAG applications
  • •Extracting structured data from business documents like invoices, contracts, and reports for automation
  • •Preparing diverse document collections for training or fine-tuning language models
  • •Converting academic papers and research documents with complex equations and figures for LLM training datasets
  • •Processing legacy document archives with multi-column layouts and mixed content types into searchable text format
  • •Creating high-quality training data from technical manuals, textbooks, and scientific publications for domain-specific language models

FAQ

Which is more popular, Docling or olmocr?
Docling has more GitHub stars (68,329 vs 19,687).
Which is more actively developed, Docling or olmocr?
Docling had more commits in the last 90 days (357 vs 0).
Should I use Docling or olmocr?
Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.