DeepCode vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +40 for DeepCode.
- Pick DeepCode for: "DeepCode: Open Agentic Coding (Agent Harness & Loop Engineering & Multi-Agent Orchestration)". Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
D
DeepCodeopen-source
"DeepCode: Open Agentic Coding (Agent Harness & Loop Engineering & Multi-Agent Orchestration)"
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| DeepCode | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16.7k | 40.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 40 | 2.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 362 | 22.8k |
| Releases (6m) | 5 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.597276451862984 | 0.9308227395695856 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, DeepCode or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,486 vs 16,665).
- Which is more actively developed, DeepCode or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 362).
- Should I use DeepCode or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.