DBX vs Figma-Context-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- DBX is growing faster: +11,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Figma-Context-MCP.
- Pick DBX for: 25 MB cross-platform client for 100+ databases with a built-in AI assistant and MCP Server. Pick Figma-Context-MCP for: mCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
D
DBXopen-source
25 MB cross-platform client for 100+ databases with a built-in AI assistant and MCP Server
F
Figma-Context-MCPopen-source
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
Metrics
| DBX | Figma-Context-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24.2k | 15.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 11.0k | 70 |
| Commits (90d) | 4.8k | 0 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 9 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 322.1K |
| Overall score | 0.9464688572947592 | 0.3435886524064716 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, DBX or Figma-Context-MCP?
- DBX has more GitHub stars (24,178 vs 15,948).
- Which is more actively developed, DBX or Figma-Context-MCP?
- DBX had more commits in the last 90 days (4,839 vs 0).
- Should I use DBX or Figma-Context-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.