Which is more popular, Chaindesk or LobeHub?

LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 2,965).

Which is more actively developed, Chaindesk or LobeHub?

LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Chaindesk has had no commit in 27 months; LobeHub is actively maintained (2,427 commits in the last 90 days).
LobeHub is growing faster: +1,351 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +4 for Chaindesk.
Pick Chaindesk for: the no-code platform for building custom LLM Agents. Pick LobeHub for: open-source platform for building, scheduling, and managing collaborative AI agent teams.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

The no-code platform for building custom LLM Agents

Open-source platform for building, scheduling, and managing collaborative AI agent teams

+No-code approach potentially makes LLM agent creation accessible to non-developers
+Moderate GitHub community interest with 2940 stars
+Focuses specifically on custom LLM agents rather than general AI tools

-Extremely limited documentation makes evaluation difficult
-Unclear what specific features or capabilities are actually provided
-Cannot assess reliability, performance, or production readiness from available information

Which is more popular, Chaindesk or LobeHub?: LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,959 vs 2,965).
Which is more actively developed, Chaindesk or LobeHub?: LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,427 vs 0).
Should I use Chaindesk or LobeHub?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.