Which is more popular, Chaindesk or Dify?

Dify has more GitHub stars (157,757 vs 2,965).

Which is more actively developed, Chaindesk or Dify?

Dify had more commits in the last 90 days (2,369 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Chaindesk has had no commit in 27 months; Dify is actively maintained (2,369 commits in the last 90 days).
Dify is growing faster: +3,637 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +4 for Chaindesk.
Pick Chaindesk for: the no-code platform for building custom LLM Agents. Pick Dify for: production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

The no-code platform for building custom LLM Agents

Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.

+No-code approach potentially makes LLM agent creation accessible to non-developers
+Moderate GitHub community interest with 2940 stars
+Focuses specifically on custom LLM agents rather than general AI tools

-Extremely limited documentation makes evaluation difficult
-Unclear what specific features or capabilities are actually provided
-Cannot assess reliability, performance, or production readiness from available information

Which is more popular, Chaindesk or Dify?: Dify has more GitHub stars (157,757 vs 2,965).
Which is more actively developed, Chaindesk or Dify?: Dify had more commits in the last 90 days (2,369 vs 0).
Should I use Chaindesk or Dify?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.