Which is more popular, Cursor or Dev-GPT?

Cursor has more GitHub stars (33,257 vs 1,866).

Which is more actively developed, Cursor or Dev-GPT?

Cursor had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Dev-GPT has had no commit in 39 months; Cursor is actively maintained.
Cursor is growing faster: +116 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-0 for Dev-GPT.
Pick Cursor for: the AI Code Editor. Pick Dev-GPT for: your Virtual Development Team.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

The AI Code Editor

Dev-GPTopen-source

Your Virtual Development Team

+High community adoption with 32,000+ GitHub stars indicating strong developer interest
+Combines traditional code editing with AI coding agent capabilities in a single tool
+Active community support through dedicated forum for user feedback and feature requests

+Multi-agent AI system with specialized roles (Product Manager, Developer, DevOps) provides comprehensive development coverage
+Simple installation and CLI interface makes it accessible to developers of all skill levels
+Cross-platform support and integration with popular APIs (OpenAI, Google) ensures broad compatibility

-Limited public documentation available about specific features and capabilities
-Requires download and installation rather than being browser-based for immediate access

-Experimental version status indicates potential instability and incomplete features
-Requires paid OpenAI API access, adding ongoing operational costs
-Limited scope to microservice development only, not suitable for larger applications or different architectural patterns

•Developers looking to integrate AI assistance directly into their code editing workflow
•Teams wanting to combine traditional IDE functionality with modern AI coding capabilities
•Programmers seeking an AI-enhanced alternative to conventional code editors

•Rapid prototyping of microservices for MVP development and proof-of-concept projects
•Solo developers or small teams lacking expertise in specific areas (DevOps, architecture) who need full-stack automation
•Learning and experimentation with microservice architecture patterns through AI-generated examples

Which is more popular, Cursor or Dev-GPT?: Cursor has more GitHub stars (33,257 vs 1,866).
Which is more actively developed, Cursor or Dev-GPT?: Cursor had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).
Should I use Cursor or Dev-GPT?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.