Cua vs UI-TARS-desktop

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Cua is growing faster: +2,970 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +195 for UI-TARS-desktop.
  • Pick Cua for: scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation. Pick UI-TARS-desktop for: the Open-Source Multimodal AI Agent Stack: Connecting Cutting-Edge AI Models and Agent Infra.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

C
Cuaopen-source

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

U
UI-TARS-desktopopen-source

The Open-Source Multimodal AI Agent Stack: Connecting Cutting-Edge AI Models and Agent Infra

Metrics

CuaUI-TARS-desktop
Stars27.7k39.2k
Star velocity /mo3.0k195
Commits (90d)1.4k5
Releases (6m)100
Overall score0.90925923941742080.5061704270652263

FAQ

Which is more popular, Cua or UI-TARS-desktop?
UI-TARS-desktop has more GitHub stars (39,185 vs 27,747).
Which is more actively developed, Cua or UI-TARS-desktop?
Cua had more commits in the last 90 days (1,409 vs 5).
Should I use Cua or UI-TARS-desktop?
Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.
Cua vs UI-TARS-desktop (2026): GitHub Stats, Features & Which to Choose