Cua vs Robotgo
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Cua is growing faster: +3,320 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +70 for Robotgo.
- Pick Cua for: scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation. Pick Robotgo for: robotGo, Go Native cross-platform RPA, GUI automation, Auto test and Computer use @vcaesar.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Cuaopen-source
Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.
R
Robotgoopen-source
RobotGo, Go Native cross-platform RPA, GUI automation, Auto test and Computer use @vcaesar
Metrics
| Cua | Robotgo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27.9k | 10.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 3.3k | 70 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.5k | 13 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 5 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 8.5K | — |
| Overall score | 0.9054685646449584 | 0.5102655682083486 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Cua or Robotgo?
- Cua has more GitHub stars (27,881 vs 10,860).
- Which is more actively developed, Cua or Robotgo?
- Cua had more commits in the last 90 days (1,456 vs 13).
- Should I use Cua or Robotgo?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.