Cua vs ego lite

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Cua is growing faster: +2,970 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +765 for ego lite.
  • Pick Cua for: scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation. Pick ego lite for: browser for AI agents to automate in isolated Spaces while sharing your logins, cookies, and tabs.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

C
Cuaopen-source

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

Browser for AI agents to automate in isolated Spaces while sharing your logins, cookies, and tabs

Metrics

Cuaego lite
Stars27.7k16.8k
Star velocity /mo3.0k765
Commits (90d)1.4k220
Releases (6m)1010
Overall score0.90925923941742080.7704340310744603

FAQ

Which is more popular, Cua or ego lite?
Cua has more GitHub stars (27,747 vs 16,773).
Which is more actively developed, Cua or ego lite?
Cua had more commits in the last 90 days (1,409 vs 220).
Should I use Cua or ego lite?
Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.