Crush vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +795 for Crush.
- Pick Crush for: glamourous agentic coding for all. Pick omp for: β₯ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Crushopen-source
Glamourous agentic coding for all π
o
ompopen-source
β₯ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Crush | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28.4k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 795 | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 610 | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8508229563662519 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Crush or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,075 vs 28,448).
- Which is more actively developed, Crush or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 610).
- Should I use Crush or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.