coze-studio vs FastGPT
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- FastGPT is growing faster: +105 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for coze-studio.
- Pick coze-studio for: open-source visual platform for creating, debugging, and deploying AI agents with no-code or low-code tools. Pick FastGPT for: aI agent building platform with data processing, model invocation, visual workflows, and Docker deployment.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
coze-studioopen-source
Open-source visual platform for creating, debugging, and deploying AI agents with no-code or low-code tools
F
FastGPTopen-source
AI agent building platform with data processing, model invocation, visual workflows, and Docker deployment
Metrics
| coze-studio | FastGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21.7k | 29.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 60 | 105 |
| Commits (90d) | 1 | 440 |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.3454679855210193 | 0.7204681629618066 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, coze-studio or FastGPT?
- FastGPT has more GitHub stars (29,781 vs 21,664).
- Which is more actively developed, coze-studio or FastGPT?
- FastGPT had more commits in the last 90 days (440 vs 1).
- Should I use coze-studio or FastGPT?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.