Context Mode vs TencentDB-Agent-Memory
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Context Mode is growing faster: +7,280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +670 for TencentDB-Agent-Memory.
- Pick Context Mode for: mCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms. Pick TencentDB-Agent-Memory for: shared memory server that turns conversations, documents, and code into reusable memory assets for AI agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Context Modeopen-source
MCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms
T
TencentDB-Agent-Memoryopen-source
Shared memory server that turns conversations, documents, and code into reusable memory assets for AI agents
Metrics
| Context Mode | TencentDB-Agent-Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25.1k | 27.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 7.3k | 670 |
| Commits (90d) | 141 | 53 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 88.9K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8332926937375552 | 0.732252791093515 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Context Mode or TencentDB-Agent-Memory?
- TencentDB-Agent-Memory has more GitHub stars (27,655 vs 25,150).
- Which is more actively developed, Context Mode or TencentDB-Agent-Memory?
- Context Mode had more commits in the last 90 days (141 vs 53).
- Should I use Context Mode or TencentDB-Agent-Memory?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.