Codewhale vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +2,860 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-70 for Codewhale.
- Pick Codewhale for: open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Codewhaleopen-source
Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Codewhale | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 41.0k | 34.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | -70 | 2.9k |
| Commits (90d) | 8.0k | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 17.2K | — |
| Overall score | 0.6097216600785769 | 0.9294757830416892 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Codewhale or omp?
- Codewhale has more GitHub stars (41,037 vs 34,159).
- Which is more actively developed, Codewhale or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (14,033 vs 8,003).
- Should I use Codewhale or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.