codebase-memory-mcp vs Graphify
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Graphify is growing faster: +6,540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,620 for codebase-memory-mcp.
- codebase-memory-mcp is open-source; Graphify is freemium.
- Pick codebase-memory-mcp for: mCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP. Pick Graphify for: local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
codebase-memory-mcpopen-source
MCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP
G
Graphifyfreemium
Local tool that parses code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs into a queryable knowledge graph
Metrics
| codebase-memory-mcp | Graphify | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 45.7k | 123.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.6k | 6.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 2.0k | 1.1k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 70.9K | 1.6M |
| Overall score | 0.8944758248474755 | 0.9044125608136018 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, codebase-memory-mcp or Graphify?
- Graphify has more GitHub stars (123,420 vs 45,713).
- Which is more actively developed, codebase-memory-mcp or Graphify?
- codebase-memory-mcp had more commits in the last 90 days (2,034 vs 1,056).
- Should I use codebase-memory-mcp or Graphify?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.